The Problem of Facebook Only Updates

There is an assumption in our society that everyone has a Facebook account.  The reality is this couldn’t be further from the truth.   Here are some points on why putting all of our eggs into Facebook is a HUGE problem:

1. If Facebook is the only place companies go to send updates, this would mean Facebook is a monopoly and needs to immediately be dismantled.
2. Facebook has not demonstrated that they have our societal values as a priority.  The purpose of Facebook, especially now they are public, is to profit from the data their users give them – for free.
3. Facebook is just like any other web site and experiences outages (accidental and caused by hackers) more than the radio or other forms of media.
4. Is Facebook really the best “platform” for dispersing information?  What about email, weblogs, and other systems?  Diversification ensures survivability.
5. People, like myself, who don’t find Facebook as beneficial as having true one on one contact, are left in the dark.  One could argue this is discriminatory toward those who choose more personal relationships.
6. In the end, the electricity goes out, so does Facebook and a bunch of other things.  Ink or pencil and paper will survive.
7. There is very little in evidence that shows Facebook is beneficial to company revenue.

I hope this gets you, the reader, thinking about the role Facebook should play in our future.  I would argue that any business or entity that only offers updates through Facebook are just being lazy and not investing the true potential of their business.

As a solution, members of the media and anyone trying to disseminate information to the public should follow an example from Lois Capps:

“Please keep in touch with me through my website, by liking my Facebook page, following me onTwitter, or sending me an email.”

Website updates along with Twitter updates and  blog posts should not be overlooked and replaced with Facebook, period.  To do so is lazy.

When a Farmhouse and Barn Collide

My creative side has been thinking about the architectural collision between a farmhouse and a barn.  While I am not sure what prompted this to consume my mind, but the problem I am trying to solve goes like this:

“You purchase a property, a former farm with rolling hills, trees, a creek, and two dilapidated structures; a barn and a two-story farmhouse.   To pay homage to the dwellings and the people who owned the land previously, you decide you want to keep the feel of the two buildings.  The problem is that you can only build a single structure and this structure needs to represent both the farmhouse and barn and must include salvaged materials. “

This problem has been at the forefront of my thoughts for a few days now.  So far, I have done a bit of research on barns and farmhouses as well as produced two quick sketches.  What I am keeping in mind is the structure needs to morph between the two structures.  What I see first is the farmhouse, but as the eye moves away from the front door (bright red, of course) the structure morphs into the barn to leave the viewer with the question, what is it, a barn or farmhouse?

I really think this presents an interesting dilemma as there are numerous approaches you can take to solving the problem.

• For one, you can either start with the farmhouse or you start with the barn.
• Second, you can focus on representing the barn through use of materials and let the farmhouse dominate the view.
• Third, you can leverage the “rolling hills” and have a two faced structure such as a two story farmhouse on the hilltop and from the bottom all you see is a three story barn.

In both of my sketches, I started with the overall shape of a barn and appended farmhouse type features to it.  A farmhouse to me is represented by massive porches, multi-pane windows with shudders, white clapboard siding, and gables.   After looking at pictures of farmhouses, I added dormer windows to the list as well as brick fireplaces.

In sketch A, the basic barn shape exists and appends a massive front porch and white clapboard siding while the rest of the structure is in red barn siding. All first story windows match the windows on the front porch elevation.  The second floor windows are much more in tune with the simple square windows of a barn with 12+ windows placed in a row above the farmhouse roof line.  To represent the hay loft, I placed a massive window on the second story with a pulley above.  Out the back is an addition with a gable that represents a later addition to the simple farmhouse wrapped in white clapboard siding.   The interesting thing about this version is it appears to be a farmhouse pancaked with a barn on top of it.

Farmhouse meets barn… sketching the problem

In sketch B, I wanted to distort the rectangle shape of the barn, so I added a typical farmhouse gable to one side, extending out with a wrap about porch and front door.  Again, this is wrapped in white clapboard with black shudders and some type of wood shingle on the roof which would contrast with the metal roof of the barn.  The barn itself would be red and would feature a mix of square and rectangular windows.  One end of the barn would have massive wooden doors that open to reveal glass doors.   Out the back of the barn (opposite side the gable) would be an additional structure, possibly made of stone that features a scaled down gable.   After taking a look at this version, I see a barn with a farmhouse attached to it. Wether or not the barn or farmhouse dominates, depends on the size of the front gable as the sketch’s gable is not the right proportion for my vision.

What is missing from both of these sketches are dormer windows and the brick fireplaces.   It would also be interesting to think of the lot the structure would sit on.  In fact, a number of questions pop into my head that can help this take on more detail:  Is there a creek nearby?  What is the terrain?  Where would the driveway go?  How can the interior layout leverage the transitions between spaces?

As I develop the idea, I am more inclined to find a middle ground between A and B.  I like the pancake nature, but I would like to break away the barn shape.  Again, leveraging material type and color would be key to taking this ho-hum to an awesome home that belongs on a magazine cover.

As I continue to develop this idea, I will post more.  For now, think about the complimentary nature of farmhouse and barn and how they come together and where they don’t.   If you have any ideas, please leave a comment.